What is with persia -Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.55.114 ( talk) 10:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC) Caesar TheFedExPope ( talk) 18:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Persia Sorry, but all this official talk here is confusing. So does all this mean that this article can be more similar to the Civ IV article (where the nation details are tailed.) The site they got the civ leader info from, the official game site, also includes unique units/buildings as well as abilities. This is not the problem with Civ V, it is that it is essentially a self-published wiki fan site (see points 1, 11 & 12 on this link). 198.161.174.222 ( talk) 20:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Actually, a secondary source is preferable to a primary (follow the links to read why). ZeroOne ( talk / 13:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Another reason why Civ V Info Centre would not be used is because if all they are doing is repeating primary information then the preferred reference would be who Civ V Info Centre is getting the information from.
#When you buy civilization 4 on amazon for a mac you install it license
The Civ V Info Centre also does not contain any mention of the origin, owner or license of the images, making their use questionable. I think we will add screenshots of the game into this article at some point but similar rationales will have to be written for them too. You've got a detailed non-free media use rationale as well as licensing information plainly visible there. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC) I'm curious as to how the WP article can use the copyright Civ5 logo directly off Firaxis website (you didn't even bother to change the filename), yet released screenshots (cropped to fit the Info Centre's content better) off the official website (are contravening WP rules. Is there anything on this site that cannot be added to Wikipedia? That excludes pictures of artwork that are copyright violations, which appears to be a feature of the Civ V Info Centre. Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.15.62 ( talk) 04:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC) A primary consideration for external links is to sites with information that cannot be included in the Wikipedia article. If Civ V Info Centre is not allowed then neither should wikia's link as it is the same type of external link. The wiki linked to is not advertising anything, it provides information to those wishing to learn what will be available in the game. 46 Nothing to discuss here, "These standards have been developed in accordance with fundamental Wikipedia policies and guidelines and reflect the consensus of the community."Ĭiv V Info Centre should be allowed as it's a collection of information from previews, GDC articles and confirmed primary source information on the game.
customer reviews: fundamental flaw in Wikipedia's guide lines 33 Please stop adding the Amazon reviews as negative feedback.31 Recommend adding a section 'Changes from Civilization 4'.23 Re: People changing the name and/or spelling of Leaders/Civs/Buildings/Units etc.21 ATI Crossfire and Nvidia SLI Problems.20 Edit request from Christian.Oberndorfer, 3 October 2010.17 Is it necessary or misleading to hotlink all the in-game abilities?.
0 kommentar(er)
